July 29, 2015

Giant 2-3 Mile Tiles Cover Pluto's Surface With 100 Mile Above Ground Tunnel, July 28, 2015, UFO Sighting News.

Date of discovery: July 28, 2015
Location of discovery: Pluto
Source NASA Photo: http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpeg/PIA19714.jpg

This is an interesting close up of the surface of Pluto. We see that NASA recognises that there are a lot of square and rectangle patches along its surface and they even go so far as to point it out, calling it, Irregularly-shaped segments. No Kidding NASA? Every segment has four right angles! It like the surface the Death Star in Star Wars. 

These look more like we are looking at the outside of a ship, than at the surface of a dwarf planet. It is not patches of ice we are looking at, but an alien metal that may be partly covered in stellar dust. This looks like the planet was covered with a false surface, which may have a massive population that lives safely below. 

Note the enormous above the ground tunnel that is perfectly straight and covered over 100 miles in length.  This is impossible in nature for its massive size, yet, here it is. I have found similar tunnels like this in many Earth moon photos. 


9 comments:

  1. Now if anything looks like a low format pic of pixels it's that top pic.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Remember it looks like that because the memory of photo taken with technology made in the 70's is shit, even the satellite in its basic program would have a form of resolution x memory format, the power of that satellite computer is the same as a 99 cent store calculator

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Or the late nineties. Whatever. NH was launched in 2006 remember.

      Delete
  3. Man It's such a low quality shot that its hard to see really much of anything I mean it makes it look like farmland more than anything else with some river valleys and lakes.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Why cant hubble pinpoint pluto again? It should be able to see even a grain of rock on the surface.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mainly because the hubble is constrained to using real science rather than the Hollywood magickal style. Don't remember back a couple few years ago when this was a legitimate sounding question and the scientific community tried to explain to folk who watch too much television? Well here's a link: http://www.planetary.org/blogs/emily-lakdawalla/2013/02141014-hubble-galaxy-pluto.html

      Delete
  5. suppose i showed you a photograph as evidence of e.t.s.? no? how about a dozen? no? well, how about MILLIONS!

    ReplyDelete
  6. The Hubble did take shots of Pluto but they only showed shades of something on the surface much like the early satellite shots from NH. Take a Hubble shot of our moon and then we would get some real detail. Why don't we see any Hubble shots of our moon from Hubble? Well for one the excuse is that it is too bright, of course we know that is total bullshit, a child's camera can take great shots of the sun so I'm sure the apeture can be adjusted for the brightness of the moon. No, the truth is that clear close up photos of our moon are prohibited, the moon is fully inhabited except for a very few historical "parks". Every space rock seems to have evidence of Alien visitation or habitation. Shhh, it's a secret that people (with more credibility than me) have been murdered for disclosing. That's why the tiny bit of "real science" we get to see seems so lacking. My opinion comes after over 45 years of closely following our space programs complete with research and personal experimentation.

    ReplyDelete