2016-07-09

KGB Files Reveal Russia UFO crash and recovery of 1968, Alien Autopsy (original video) UFO Sighting News.







Date of UFO crash: March 1969
Location of UFO crash: Yekaterinburg, USSR

This is the Secret KGB UFO Files, The Russian Crash of 1969. Its real, 100% and I can find no flaws in it. Its an old film bought on the blackmarket for 10K US and some how leaked to the public. I see why. The video shows both an alien craft, and a blueish green alien body that was recovered. This is enough to cause panic across the planet if the news ever got hold of it. You ask, are aliens real? But its probably the same questions they ask about us. I can vouch for this evidence at being real. You have my word on it. 

This leads to another thing...the continuing of the Apollo missions...covertly. NASA pretended to end the missions after Apollo 17, but they continued past 20. Russia was part of it. The NASA symbol has both flags in a cooperation displayed in the Apollo 20 videos. Apollo 20 took place about 1974-1975. Just 4-5 years after the UFO crash in the USSR. 

I remember talking to Willam Rutledge (astronaut on Apollo 20) on Youtube messages, and he said there was a cigar UFO and a triangle UFO in Deporte crater on our moon. They explored both. I had doubts, but I was the first person to ever find the ship in Deporte crater and report it to the public. William was very excited and didn't expect such a photo existed, but he liked it when I told him about it. He must have been about 77 when we spoke, but...may not be with us anymore and stopped talking to anyone after his Youtube account was hacked by the US government. 
Scott C. Waring
www.ufosightingsdaily.com

Report states:
The details of a Russian Crash on or about 1969 are sketchy and somewhat suspect. This case comes from the so-called "Secret KGB Files," which were reportedly smuggled out of the former Soviet Union. Reportedly, $10,000 was paid for the information. The details of these secret files were first offered to the general public on 9-13-98 as part of a TNT special titled "The Secret UFO Files of the KGB." The show featured extraordinary film and still photographs of the UFO recovery, and also a portion of autopsy film on part of an alien body. 

The event itself, according to the files, occurred in the state of Sverdlovsky, which was formerly Yekatrinburg of the USSR. The crash story follows a familiar pattern normally associated with this type of report. The fiery crash of an unknown object occurred in March 1969. The site was secured by the Russian military, and one dead alien was found in the wreckage. The remains of the craft and alien were brought to a secure location, and the alien body was autopsied. Both still and moving pictures were taken of the craft, its retrieval, and the alien autopsy. The autopsy shows only an alien torso and arm. From the size of the body parts, the alien would have been an extremely small being. 

The TNT special features Roger Moore, veteran actor and former James Bond, who discusses other UFO events, along with interviews with UFO experts, CIA agents, and other film. Probably the most notable footage is from MIG gun cameras of confrontations with UFOs. There have been only a few still frames of this footage in America, and I have not been able as of this writing, 11-01-2002, to obtain the videos. The show itself is mediocre, and its only redeeming quality is the presentation of the UFO crash story. Supposedly, the crash story was validated by secret KGB documents. 

The footage at the crash site does seem to be authentic at least on several points. The truck in the film is a circa 1950 model ZIS151, which has not been used by the military for quite some time, and the truck would have been difficult to find to stage a hoax with. Other elements of the film do not exhibit any obvious signs of a hoax, as to the movement of the soldiers, the timing of the film as to shadows, and the UFO itself. 

There are also several documents shown to verify the event itself, and an eyewitness to the event who swears that the recovery mission did occur. The footage of the autopsy film shows personnel without caps and gowns, which seemed odd to me at first, but after some research I found that this was commonplace for that era in Russia. 
The furnishings in the room are acceptable, and in Russia have probably not changed much today. Three men in their 20's and 30's are performing the procedure, and one woman is taking notes. The note taker is identified as KGB stenographer O. A. Pshonikina. The alien's torso and arm are lying together on the table as the autopsy is performed, and there are documents shown to support the autopsy. 

Although the USA-Russia relationship is much improved over a few years ago, it still lacks. Any information received is subject to translation, and often times there are problems with interpretation. It is sad there is not more cooperation between the two countries. The case of the 1969 retrieval and autopsy are difficult to assess. Until more information is uncovered, it will remain unsubstantiated. 



19 comments:

  1. I'm calling fake.

    The disk crash doesn't appear to match the treeline at all. If anything, it should be facing the opposite direction.

    The disc looks as if it is made from stone. It looks like an old tombstone, and is uneven in places that should be symmetrical and precise. It looks sloppily made.

    The crash appears to be growning out of the ground. It doesn't look like a crash. There's no debris, and the ground doesn't look like something embedded itself. It literally looks like a giant tombstone shaped like a disk craft.

    I've never seen an autopsy vid that is remotely convincing. Mainly because there is no way in hell that those in control would let one be broadcast to the public via TV or internet.

    Overall seems like a corny hoax.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Im thinking of carved wood or some sort of foam. Pay attention to where the craft structure meets the ground. Whoever did this could not be bothered to dig down a little bit before placement.

      Make no mistake tho, I do enjoy this site and dont just dismiss everything i see. For instance, Ive seen my share of shasta UFOs :P

      Delete
  2. Doesn't make sense. The trajectory of the ufo should have made a distinguished path through the trees. See the trees behind. How did it penetrate so and not left a trail? No disrespect intended Scott. On your site everyday and appreciate your work.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How can you predict how this kind of technology will crash? Even I have never seen one crash, but don't discard this one. It came out long before 2010...the time when the first fake videos began to rise on Youtube from Americans. Other countries seemed to not fake as much as the US, even today.

      Delete
    2. I hear you. Good point. I have no idea about advanced technology.

      Delete
    3. Physics never changes mate. You've seen the crashing test flight's at groom lk. These flip like a coin, that's either been there a looong time and no one ever, EVER visited this part of the Forrest or it's great propaganda. I believed this for yrs, it's like a beginner's guide to being duped in the field. Rule no 1, we're gullible,we're human,we want to believe. Even if the ship's real, that autopsy isn't. You don't use Engineer's Tinsnips in an Autopsy!

      Delete
  3. Why can't these folks keep it between the lines? J/k.. reason#1 texting and flying. #2. Kids yelling from the back seat. #3 grandpa's cough medicine. Gnite from roseburg oregon. Eyes always up

    ReplyDelete
  4. And why can we look through the ufo at 30 seconds in. It's translucent. Top half of the ufo.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I meant to comment when you posted this before. What an extraordinary opportunity that must have been to speak directly to him,and hear about the mission first hand. I think you said he disussed the pilot, and many tubes containing little bodies. Had he been expecting that when headed to the site? Talk about overwhelming. Had he been afraid, or business as usual? Million questions must have popped into your mind. So smart to look him up on the chance he would talk to you!

    ReplyDelete
  6. have you ever pushed anything down into dirt? Among several other problems with the presentation in video(s), like resting trajectory, the trees, the actual crafts construction, the handling of camera, this is dubious at best. If the body in the autopsy video came from the craft in the first video then it too is fake. Some one(s) got a nice 10k payday.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed. It's fake. A UFO comes crashing through the forest of trees and all trees around it are standing? no evidence of fire, explosion? Continuously promoting phony ufo stuff as real does make t real and takes away from other things that are truly interesting.

      Delete
  7. Rutledge and his whole story is a fake, phony fraud. There was no appollo missions after 17. This is not the first time you have referenced him. Wish you would stop.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I totally agree with all who are saying that this is a staged event. The angle of the saucer is approximately 45 degrees, and yet there are trees clearly visible almost next to the object. Either this happened hundreds of years ago, thereby allowing mother nature sufficient time to regrow the downed trees, or it is a complete waste of our time Scott. If this is indeed a very old crash site, then how did the body survive long enough to be autopsied? This entire episode is bogus!

    ReplyDelete
  9. This is a funny hoax. It is clearly made from snow. It has the same white and blue tinge you can see in the surrounding ice. If you look at the 2nd picture posted you can see a ball of melted snow that has started to roll down the object that wasn't visible in earlier pictures. You can also see a flat edge on the bottom that does not go into the ground it sits on top of it. If it was a saucer shape it would continue in a circular pattern and penetrate the earth. The way this snow ufo was made makes it a half saucer.
    If you look at the 3rd picture it looks like one of the gentlemen are reaching out to grab some of the snow off of the object.
    If the people pictured were not in on the hoax they were probably just doing their job. Someone may have entered a secured military area at night and created this snow saucer thus making it a security matter. I'm sure they all had a great laugh after.

    ReplyDelete
  10. This is a fake army operation. Look at the angle of UFO. If real ,the craft would of been there for 50 years at least to allow an entire Forrest to grow around it. The tree's should be torn apart or the craft should be leaning the opposite direction. No biological matter would stay that fresh. Propaganda to counter American Roswell possibly?

    ReplyDelete
  11. I remember seeing this alleged K G B UFO release way back in the mid 90's before the creation of those "PC crucial Photo Shop App Remakes", however my question everyone is where are those Russian military/intell team members that was there & filmed, are they still alive to varify this story from 1969 to 2016 just short of 50yrs now, & have any of these men died of unkown to them at the time, the apparent leaked RADIATION CONCERNS that must have been known by ALL the global superpowers even back in 69 regarding crashed & OR damaged ET craft unless this perticular crew was not & maybe even deliberately not informed, then those men ages should range from there early sixties to mid eighties that im guestimatin...

    That is & ill repeat again, if the leaked RADS from this K G B filmed ALLEGED crashed UFO did not kill most if not all of that russian military crew & including that one Boris Battanoff looking character w/ the blk fedora & leather coat on that looks & acts like hes runninn things there, hell hes possibly a K G B officer himself w/ a hella lot of answers to tell if hes still around to tell it which i doubt because a living agent even in retirement revealing this kind of info if true could be highly suspected & could turn out to be in a very dangerous situation for there freedoms or lives perhaps to reveal themselves on film ya thk crewmates, but i will indicate to all here is that the "U.S. of A's" seem to be a bit more Stuck Up regarding global info regarding even past dated UFO occurances as oppose to say a Russia or Chinas just to name a couple places, whom seem to not have much problems releasing this sub to there gen to global public, So Why Is That w/ the "U.S. of A's" on the releasing of this kind of mtr'l, well like Bush sir thk's & quote "They cant handle the truth" & after reading this post & its commentors, hell i thk hes right on that comment sometimes. ;(

    ReplyDelete
  12. It's stuck in the mud. The ground was very soft around the craft when it crashed. This is why you can see trees still growing behind it but its facing that way. It crashed from the opposite side. Craft was found few years after it landed by hunter from the village 10km away. I strongly believe that alien (or whatever it is) on second video was not from this crash. As far as I know was no bodies found inside of the craft.

    ReplyDelete

Welcome to the forum, what your thoughts?