November 25, 2017

NASA releases New Apollo 16 Footage, Which Is Proof They Faked The Missions, UFO Sighting News.




NASA just released a few minutes of footage from the Apollo 16 mission and guess what? Its been edited! At 3 seconds into the video, a whole 4 or more seconds were cut out as the rover was turning. What I think is that the rover got stuck turning and a lot of guys ran out onto the stage set and pushed it to turn it fully. That cut is 100% proof they used photoshop to remove worrisome footage from the publics view. 

Also note the dirt flying up from the tires. The speed at which it moves from the tires and the speed at which it falls is not equal to the 1/6 that of here on Earth. So why does the dirt fall and shoot back at normal Earth-like gravity speed? That dirt should be flying 6 times longer, but its not. It should be much slower to fall, and there should be some continuous dust clouds from smaller particles that should not fall for a few minutes, yet, all the dirt particles are on the ground in just a few seconds. 

Check out the video below they released today and judge for yourself. Tell us your thoughts in the comments below. 
Scott C. Waring

25 comments:

  1. Have you considered the absence of atmosphere?

    ReplyDelete
  2. The height of the dust plumage suggests suggests 1/6 gravity.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You can't eqaute that! Where's the other 19/20ths of the eqaution? Smoke em if u got em

      Delete
  3. Most likely one of the late Kubrick's films while he worked for them or was forced to work for them.
    On another note, I am so glad you are back☺

    ReplyDelete
  4. That could have been made last week on a budget by pre schoolers... Totally unrealistic! And...I'm SO glad you're back too! πŸ‘ πŸ‘ πŸ‘

    ReplyDelete
  5. It's fake, it's a shame we cannot beleave anything from NASA or our government. We are not alone for sure but how can we get the truth at this point with so much miss information out there. This is the biggest issue facing us,HOW????

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's NAZA, where do nasas scientists originate ? HEIL HITLER. Scott your the smartest American i know because your not dumb enough to be there.

      Delete
    2. Are you Andy from Before its news? Style is similar .

      Delete
  6. We need a new approach at GETTING to the truth.
    We all should be thinking How? We are running out of time,the false flag is heading our way and once that takes place it willl be to late. Please think about EVERYONE

    ReplyDelete
  7. Its a very sad thing that our U.S would fake us all.We can't trust America.Now that is real.!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  8. The New Third Eye is coming. Every man, woman, and child will see the truth for him- or herself.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Get your facts straight: NASA did not 'just release this', it's been out for decades.

    Learn some science: The rooster tail plume and it characteristics are a clear indication of both low gravity and zero atmosphere. The reason all of the particles fall relatively quickly is precisely because there is no atmosphere to suspend the smaller ones so they descend at the same rate as larger ones. A camera reel missing a few frames is not evidence of fakery, and they could not have used any kind of Photoshop as it didn't exist then (ignoring the fact that you don't use Photoshop to edit film).

    All those stage hands rushing about and not one astronaut footprint is brushed out? Why not just retake the whole sequence?

    You can't have it both ways - a lot of your site consists of NASA Apollo images you claim show UFO anomalies. If they faked the missions, they couldn't have taken those.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Not all were faked just some. It is a mixture of fake, secret and some true missions - just as always is with everything that is coming from any controlled entity.
    After all this I do not even consider NASA as any authority on the "anything space related" subject. We are not alone and ETs have been here all along, good and bad. We all have to look inside our hearts where all the true answers can be found.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I'm just glad to have you back, Scott. While I don't agree with all of your posts, I think you provide a vital perspective. Keep posting and don't let the trolls get to you.

    ReplyDelete
  12. "We all have to look inside our hearts where all the true answers can be found."

    C'mon, please. You don't seriously mean that, do you? Even hardened UFO and conspiracy nuts will probably snigger at that. Most people look inside their hearts, they find ventricles. Love at best. Not evidence of alien origins.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Streetcap1 just posted this same video (part of it) on YouTube with very interesting comments titled "Missing frames and lunar rover lost a tire"πŸ˜ŽπŸ€”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Streetcap1 needs to communicate when shown better evidence he produces as his Jealousy is loosing him Credibility faster than he acknowledges. I used to respect him until he thought he's untouchable royalty. (spirit bear love the name, he knows what i mean)

      Delete
  14. How did they get the chassis of a Ford there to begin with? I never saw it on apollo's roof rack? Or unloading ? OR ?????

    ReplyDelete
  15. Trump as pesident if we are ever gonna get the truth he os the one to give it on a tweet lol

    ReplyDelete
  16. My Mother says it's true too. She no Bimbo. She like my Brother and his Lover they UFO crackpots too. Keep it up Scott. You are the daftest internet man on earth. I like big one's.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Shouldn't there be stars in the sky ???

    ReplyDelete
  18. Tom - No there shouldn't be stars in the sky. The brightness of the subject and the brightness of the Moon's surface are such that the films exposure cannot record the stars and have the stars exposed. if the film/photographs were exposed for the sky/stars then the astronaut and moons surface would be massively overexposed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks it bugged me so much I
      Looked it up and your right

      Delete
  19. Wouldn't have faking the moon landing and subsequent photos and videos taking their, and artifacts returned, had been harder then just going there in the first place? Fair question, I'm just looking for an explanation.

    ReplyDelete