August 10, 2015

NASA Posts Fake Mars Photo As Real, Worst Fake Photo Ever! Aug 2015, UFO Sighting News.


Date of discovery: August 9, 2015
Location of discovery:
A rock outcrop dubbed "Missoula," near Marias Pass on Mars
Source photo: http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=pia19829




NASA got their hand caught in the cookie jar this week. What I mean is they posted a mars photo that has blatant and amateur techniques in photo shop. What I mean is this:

1. 75% of the photo is covered by a large rock outcropping  However this photo is an object. A photo object, is one that has been cut out and pasted over an area. Another amateur mistake they made is the rock was to small of a photo, and they cut it out when it was small, then enlarged it by 5X or more to place it over the area. This caused a thick blur line to be seen between the big rock that cuts across the entire photo. 

2. The rocks at the top of the photo have been repeatedly used. What I mean is the small bunch of rocks on the upper right has been copied and pasted into two different locations.

3. The rocks on the upper left (photo object) were copied and pasted into three different locations in the photo.

Being a teacher, I have seen elementary children use photoshop more effectively than I see NASA doing here. 

I have read a lot of comments over the years from people who believe the Mars rover isn't even on Mars at all. That NASA faked it all to spend the money on other black budget things. This photo, confirms and backs up their allegations. This...worries me...that they could be right. 
Scott C. Waring
www.ufosightingsdaily.com

Eyewitness states (translated from Spanish):
The picture displayed on the NASA site blatantly shows changes made with Photoshop, the reason is not clear but it is evident how the photo was manipulated.

14 comments:

  1. yep so faked, rocks are completely the same and i am one of the people that think that the Mars rover is not on Mars at all just somewhere in the Desert (owned by the government of course)

    ReplyDelete
  2. anyone that dis believes Scott about this i can assure you he is right i have much experience in this kind of making people fool stuff great example is SAME ROCKS 2 TIMES the video you can see it very clear

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey, thanks for that. NASA has been messing around like this for to long.

      Delete
  3. the link of the source photo says server not found

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You may be in a country that America blocks.
      Try this URL, if it doesn't work, use Firefox or Google Chrome browser. It may be a Java or Flash issue.
      http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/images/largesize/PIA19829_hires.jpg

      Delete
  4. What where they thinking and why would they post a doctored photo at all. I can't believe they get away with this !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They do that to literally hide other artifacts such as vehicals of a varied assortment, scrap machinery parts, building structures thats not totaly demolished, dead beings remains thats layin around, roadways, ponds & rivers, communities, airports, stadiums, hell anything thats diffinative truths regarding ancient mars past, aside from there dead Red Planet BS theyeve been thrown at this world for almost a century now, & w/ the latest CGI upgraded software, hell they may be able to conjure a face any face for that matter via CGI on rover filming imaging too, regardless of the real statues & faces found there & many times ive noticed over layerd so called NASA rover photoed pics that they would distribute to the non pyrimidal connected & uninitiated global masses, where when they look at those pics closely some of them youll notice a physical disconnectedness to the alledged martian surface that seem to superimpose each other as if falsely layerd that i can agree upon myself...

      The SecGov is hidding something very big on the moon & mars that deals w/ hi technology naturally including megga minerals, & also what i suspect are mars past humanoid populations, & what i highly suspect are those Break Aways RACIAL DISTASTE for the full human ancient martian populace who were not all totally of the cacasion racial genetics, & to take this a altitude higher & furthure, ill include the horrors those early pre SecGov/SSP break aways must have had regarding the Human Animal Hybrid race statues & remains they had discovered regarding ancient mars that those racist NAZI break away SOB's did no approve of imo.

      Delete
  5. It's abundantly clear to me that this is an altered image, poorly done at that. My question is....why go to the bother of altering it so badly, why just not release it at all? I am new here, apologies if this is a common question.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Very very interesting. This is very compelling, must have taken a long time to find. I personally think that the Rover is in indeed on Mars, the geology in the pictures is different from anything I have seen on earth.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I'm quite curious to hear your thoughts and views on "Other black budget" projects Scott...

    ReplyDelete
  8. Wow. Yeah, I was going to point out several other matches that were just DISGUSTING(!), but I see they were covered in the video. Most notably, the Sharp edge of rock pointing to the right that begins at your down pointing arrow on the far left side of your blur image demonstration. This is really quite an incredible thing for me to see, because I've never been exposed to anything like it before. Thank you for helping me see the light. Or, darkness, maybe.

    ReplyDelete
  9. You've got hold of the wrong end of the stick again waring. Your "large rock outcropping" is about four decimeters across, as stated in the image details. That's sixteen inches or thereabouts. The hand lens imager (mahli) is effectively a microscope with a ccd chip in it. Your 'blur lines' are evidence only of the photomosaic process. Have you never heard of parallax? Or seen on TV in extreme closeups the camera moves a little but the background goes whooshing past, depending on what lens is fitted of course. Seriously you'd have to be a credulous booby to believe NASA's dumb enough to post something like this if they weren't sure rational people would figure it for what it actually is, not paranoid fancies of grade school English teachers. OK done.

    ReplyDelete
  10. It's because we never went to Mars, or the Moon. Got to crop out that stray shopping cart if it creeps into view, or blur it out.

    The Arctic lemming you folks posted here is indigenous to Devon Greenland where NASA is taking these pictures. You can find this on Google Earth (Enable the gigipxl whatever.

    We never been to Mars, and all those strange metal things you find, just happen to be junk laying around Devon.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Check out crrow777 YouTube channel. He has some videos that explain radio waves from Mars wouldn't be able to travel to earth through the Van Allen belts.

    ReplyDelete