March 28, 2016

UFOs: SLAYING THE DRAGON – STANTON T. FRIEDMAN - MUFON UFO SYMPOSIUM, UFO Sighting News.


I like Stanton Friedman, he does things in a very technical and old school way. He spends a lot of time to focus on the smallest details of a case, just as it should be. If we had a dozen guys like Stanton, disclosure would already be here.
Scott. C. Waring
www.ufosightingsdaily.com

News states:
Stanton T. Friedman believes that there are many things that can be done to improve the respectability score of ufology. In his words, "we can show people facts and the sources of the data." This presentation includes the details of: 
 1. Advanced nuclear fission rockets that operate using the same energy as our Sun. 
2. The results of major studies such as Project Blue Book, - Special Report No. 14. 
3. The false claims that have been made by what Stanton Friedman refers to as "the noisy negativists" and those who foolishly claim that Governments can't keep secrets. 
4. Blacked out Classified UFO documents. 
5. UFO pictures that real scientists say are genuine. 
6. Reasons for Aliens to visit Earth without landing on the White House lawn and for Governments to withhold evidence. 
7. Preparing Research Papers for Journal Publication and the peer review process. 
8. How to stop being Apologetic UFOlogists and speak out.

2 comments:

  1. Well 7 out of 8 is not bad, tho personally im not onboard w/ the 1st statement, which is using so called advance "Nuclear Fission" rocket engines thats equivalent to YOUR sun energy's to travel thru the vacums of time & space seems a bit primitive you think, i mean Mr S Friedman former nuclear physicist seems to still have a vested interest in that leaky, toxic & dangerous earth created backwards tech, that its creators never ever to this very day learned how to dispose of those spent reactor fuel rods even, so again 7 out of 8 is good imo.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Someone once said, "There is only two possibilities. Either we are alone in the universe or we are not. Both are equally terrifying." It's time to find an undeniable proof.

    ReplyDelete