Got it. Measuring only the bright head changes it a lot.
Using the same LASCO C2 image scale:
Full frame width ≈ 4.2 million km
1024 px image gives about ~4,100 km per pixel
From your enlarged inset, the bright head looks roughly about 4 to 6 pixels wide at its brightest solid part.
Bright head size estimate
4 px × 4,100 km = ~16,400 km
6 px × 4,100 km = ~24,600 km
Best estimate
👉 Bright head size: about 16,000 to 25,000 km across
That makes it roughly:
1.3 to 2 times Earth’s diameter in apparent size
Speed
The speed estimate stays about the same as before, because that depends on how far it moved between frames, not on the trail length:
👉 about 500 to 900 km/s
If you want, I can also do a more exact pixel-count estimate from the image itself and give you a tighter number for the head diameter.
So ChatGPT says its size is 1.3 to 2times the Earths diameter in size or 16,000-25,000km across.
I had it convert the speed in km per hour again and it said; 👉 About 1.8 million to 3.24 million km/h. So I honestly can say...it was fast. It said it was too fast for most meteors or asteroids.
I asked ChatGPT, could the object get out of the frame that was taken at 08:48 by 09:00? It answered;👉 Yes, at 500–900 km/s, an object could definitely be out of frame by 09:00, especially if it was already near the edge or moving diagonally outward.
So you see, UFOs frequently fly past our sun, and move so incredibly fast they that they are gone in 15 minutes later in the next frame. I'm sure NASA has continuous photos every few seconds however they would never let the public know about it. NASAs goals have been to keep the public in the dark by drop feeding them boring facts, to keep the public curiosity under control and keep funding rolling in. Aliens...are everywhere in our solar system.
Scott C. Waring - UFO Sightings Daily
