April 23, 2014

Apollo 16 LEM Photo Is Proof Of NASA Photo Altering, April 23, 2014, UFO Sighting News.


Date of discovery: April 23, 2014

I found this photo and was confused at why space didn't look like space, no stars, gasses or anything...nothing like what I see when I look at the live space station cam. The LEM (Lunar Excusion Module)  also had perfect lighting which is odd for space. I decided to add a little light to the object to see if I could catch any UFOs in the background near it. However when I did, I found that the LEM photo had been altered, then superimposed upon the solid back background. I'm not sure what to make of this. It could be because NASA wanted that picture perfect moment and faked it, but what do you think? Check out the video I made below, but change the settings to "full screen" and HD. SCW

27 comments:

  1. It's because they never landed on the moon.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes they did. I know one of the Apollo astronauts.

      Delete
    2. I always wondered why the CIA had their own psychologist meet with the astronauts before and after landing. These doctors were highly skilled (backed up by CIA documents) with implanting false memories. Perhaps the mission only took place in his head. Just a possibility.

      Delete
  2. No Photoshop in the 70's (unless it was done 2 decades later) It would have been done with opaque, masks and photographic processes.

    ReplyDelete
  3. nasa has lied to us from the beginning no manned moon landings if you think there was ask nasa why the dark side of the moon was chosen and if you are lucky enough to catch the moon look for the landings in nasa photos its there in real life try and find them good luck

    ReplyDelete
  4. question...... could this possibly be what happen to MH370? there hasn't been any clue or sighting of the airplane, it has just vanished.... crazy i know, but just a thought.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't understand the question. Do you mean did aliens abduct the plane. They have done such things before, and NASA back in the 1970 had news about a B52 found in a crater on the moon (I can't back that up with news source). Is it possible...yes, but humanity is actually a forbidden and protected species by aliens. I don't think they would do such things. It would change future events...they think about those things a lot.

      Delete
  5. question...... could this possibly be what happen to MH370? there hasn't been any clue or sighting of the airplane, it has just vanished.... crazy i know, but just a thought.

    ReplyDelete
  6. question...... could this possibly be what happen to MH370? there hasn't been any clue or sighting of the airplane, it has just vanished.... crazy i know, but just a thought.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I see star light hash on the photo shoppe.photo shoppe in 71 didn't know it was made until about 89 had 286 and was cheesy at best.so I say either this ps was ps again from nasa and cut out to black background by 3 party.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Of course I am not implying that they used the actual "Photoshop" program, but rather a program or method that altered the photo. Sorry if people are misunderstanding. The word has several meanings.

      Delete
  8. The LEM did not land on the moon. That device could not support two humans; it has been proven. The entire moon landing footage was shot in a studio.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Toward the subject of other life we are the best example. Toward being a part of such universality however rests on a different upshot. Some years ago in Davos, Switzerland, Bill Clinton ended a speech there with a nod to the environment saying either we take care of it, “…or nothing else will matter.” Forget Global Warming and Climate Change. Environmental degradation and life-loss is leading to the same, “Self-Extinction,” easily defined as, “To having gotten it all wrong.” Think of a “Self-Extinct” label to be the highest demerit a space colony can receive.

    Toward a passing grade and to insure relevancy in search of greater life, it must be understood that powerfully addictive and influential “negative thinking” causes extinction by disallowing vision. In comparison, little used or understood “positive thinking” has enormous potential but as of yet valueless in society. One result of the affirmation imbued in such potential allows for the very credence (information) this response space is looking for. Kindly underline, the animate has advantage over the inanimate. Self reliance is spontaneity of nature when and where evolution supports positive reflective thought. It is why from indications it appears celestial occupancy is ahead of us.

    Given the current uncertainty about our future, the potential of positive thinking (PT) can be put to work by remembering this simple adage: “We have to have a future to have one.” Whatever one envisions, and billions are needed, think of yours as an anchor in the future to ever pull us toward. With less negativity imagine what the term “Long Term Survival” (LTS) might mean, and in turn, consider colonies achieving “LTS” living “In Tune With Nature” to realize your stake in affirmation. Yet given how a hundred positive thoughts erase but one negative, we must be ever more serious to be part of a universality now shaping imaginations. My own vision is of Year 4000 by which time inter-galactic “transfer” is common. Nobody needs to believe it because life is not about belief. Life is about respect for the unknowable, secret to keeping future open.

    Beyond ideas, science needs to “quantify” what is common to the multiverse. What is regular can by invention be called a “Universal Standard” or “UNS” by acronym. Examples: UNS-1 reads: Life begins when ready. UNS-2 refers to the elements of life being present in any stage of a universe. A third might speak to extinction as a common challenge, and so forth. As any list will be lengthy, my intention is to devise means to file whatever can be ascertained.

    Similarly, there is a need to begin organizing the vast number of sighting reports now accumulating. To begin, signals set off by our atomic tests in the 1950s likely tipped off our presence. Given action taken by a colony capable of observing, as was done, the time required to get a probe here might be about 30 years. And just as we explore with devices others would as well, except being more advanced the instrument is going to be smaller with better efficiency. My concept of the device, about the size of a grapefruit, would glow a dull red near ground level to be seen and/or as a result of generating energy for propulsion. After collecting data, such a probe would move up and out of our atmosphere accelerating geometrically. In space movement would derive from energy exchange, one possibly involving time. Mental time is only relevant to existence. But other than envisioning the animate effecting a time-energy that the inanimate in turn is passively affected, and which could explain parts of the paranormal, what else do we know about time? If animate-time has a function in open space, one result might involve a “transfer” as noted. I hope this guidance assists other. Meanwhile we must eschew emotion and prepare for the unimaginable through the use of positive thinking.

    I Remember.

    ReplyDelete
  10. wendell j bowen www.poetartistauthorbiz.bizland.comApril 25, 2014 at 9:46 AM

    This post will be very argumentive at the least, {{ The seer can see, the knowing know, to only them it can be, if by chance someone introduce's something new to the world and others back it up with evidence, well there it is huh! We cannot deny mathmatical resolution, if one was too bring evidence too the world about who we really are an why we are really here, would the people of the world except this truth? There are many walking the earth now who know and can see a truth unknown to modern man but they wish just to keep this knowledge to themselfs, for various reasons. kijigobinisse 1835

    ReplyDelete
  11. secret or no secret, it is impossible not to think that there are other beings in the vast expanse of any celestial body. the cosmos is endless, and we, earthlings, are mere specks of dusts in its vastness. so, any government-initiative to probe is but a natural tendency for humans after we accepted the idea that probing other worlds is endless, too.

    ReplyDelete
  12. anything we, humans, perceived first time as mysterious will naturally push us to probe more. the cosmos and its celestial bodies are vastness difficult to penetrate by scientific instruments because of its vastness, but it is not difficult to accept that there are other beings in some other section of these bodies. it is a given thing...

    ReplyDelete
  13. If the Apollo landing was not faked then ask yourself why all the time and money went into this setup (see url below). The Lunar Landing Module you picture has been diagnosed by engineers and proven not to be able to support two people based on oxygen tanks alone.

    http://apolloreality.atspace.co.uk/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey, fantastic info at that site. Thank you so much. I was looking for some of these things. Its all coming together now. You may be right.

      Delete
    2. You're welcome. Go through the entire website and you will see the amount of time and effort expended here to create a mock moon and landing surface is shocking. The obvious fakery is just as shocking.

      There are other cut and paste photos here as well. With your skills you will probable make some good finds.

      Delete
    3. but if all apollo photos are fake, then all the ufo's in the photos(taken from the "surface") are fake!?!? those are the ufos i show to my friends because i thought they were from "convincing" source. well I've had my own up,close and personal encounter of the third kind, so I know they are real... :) p.s. i love your site Scott!

      Delete
  14. I never believed that they traveled thru the Van Allan belt w/ that unstable & very frajile hunk of aluminum posseing as a safe space craft that id NOT want to travel to the far side of the moon in let alone thru space, hell you thk you were a piece of toast enclosed in a Ah Hum "Flyin Micro Wave Oven" you would thk ha ...

    Can we perceive crew that they may have used a "alternative source of space traveling device" designed & made by the very men who created NASA in the 1st place & that what they showed US is what they wanted to to have the unenlightened amongst US to believe what's put in our faces for plane secrecy sake naturally & also the commercial value incentive ect..

    Spk'ing of commercials guess who was one of the biggest during those Appolo missions on good old ancient gas tube TV sets around the glob at the time, ta da "Gulf Oil", now do the math, no calculus my crew, now to use anti gravitics ect would be counter to Gulf Oil Corps profit margins & just create a big conflict of business interest around this globe of ours concerning BIG OIL profits & by showing US & the world a fuel laden bomb of a rocket saturns blowin off into the atmosphere w/a supposibly payload on its nose...

    ReplyDelete
  15. And and a famous film maker by the name of Stanly Kubric had a hand in the NASA simulation films, remember that my crew.

    My question, "What Really Happened" during all the Apollo missions, well i envision that we where shown movie simulations & the real technology that got to the moon was hidden from US...

    And why you ask, simple "Advance Tech Exposure" from that "Break Away Society" ala those nazi. Expatriot paper clip scientist, engineers & tech's & the GRB's I,e. Global Robber Barons who at all cost including murder i imagine do not want alternative technologys that could get large masses of earth people of various NATIONALITYS as for the nazi decendents concerns on the moon & that also would drop there the GRB's wall st profit shares like rocks over night by US & the global masses turning away from toxic & dangerous fossil fuels thats actually if ya ask me crew is killin man & women kind here on terra firma.

    ReplyDelete
  16. And and a famous film maker by the name of Stanly Kubric had a hand in the NASA simulation films, remember that my crew.

    My question, "What Really Happened" during all the Apollo missions, well i envision that we where shown movie simulations & the real technology that got to the moon was hidden from US...

    And why you ask, simple "Advance Tech Exposure" from that "Break Away Society" ala those nazi. Expatriot paper clip scientist, engineers & tech's & the GRB's I,e. Global Robber Barons who at all cost including murder i imagine do not want alternative technologys that could get large masses of earth people of various NATIONALITYS as for the nazi decendents concerns on the moon & that also would drop there the GRB's wall st profit shares like rocks over night by US & the global masses turning away from toxic & dangerous fossil fuels thats actually if ya ask me crew is killin man & women kind here on terra firma.

    ReplyDelete
  17. And and a famous film maker by the name of Stanly Kubric had a hand in the NASA simulation films, remember that my crew.

    My question, "What Really Happened" during all the Apollo missions, well i envision that we where shown movie simulations & the real technology that got to the moon was hidden from US...

    And why you ask, simple "Advance Tech Exposure" from that "Break Away Society" ala those nazi. Expatriot paper clip scientist, engineers & tech's & the GRB's I,e. Global Robber Barons who at all cost including murder i imagine do not want alternative technologys that could get large masses of earth people of various NATIONALITYS as for the nazi decendents concerns on the moon & that also would drop there the GRB's wall st profit shares like rocks over night by US & the global masses turning away from toxic & dangerous fossil fuels thats actually if ya ask me crew is killin man & women kind here on terra firma.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Do you remember the man named Stanly Kubric, well not only did he produced great movies he was hired by NASA i understand to film the "Apollo Simulations" so in time you'll see part of this puzzle coming 2gether my crew mates

    Do you really believe that the LEM WHICH IS A HUNK OF APPROX 2" THICK ALUM is a safe vehical that can sheild a crew from dangerous amounts of gamma rays ect from deep space, the van allen belt ect, I DON'T, & look at the apollo astronauts space suits, hell if they were so radiation resistant then WHY NOT USE THEM during & on the Fukashima nuclear disaster, the past nuclear crises Chernobil, & uh GULP i hate to say more nuclear disasters to come if we don't stop using it and resort to a safer cleaner means of mass energy distribution before Nuclear Fallout Radiation kill US all here on earth...

    & if it does this present civilization on terra firma can forget about reaching the stars & beyond but mind you crew one thing is ABSOLUTE, & listen carefully, "The earth will survive but civilizations on it will come & go", & that includes this one too.

    Remember that.

    ReplyDelete