May 15, 2014

Moving Rock On Mars! Alien Animal Found, May 2014 UFO Sighting News.


Date of discovery: unknown...several years ago.
Location of sighting: Mars

Hey everyone. I made a post about this 3 years ago, but I wanted to make an updated post so I made this video to go along with it. 

Did you notice the other two smaller black animals that moved...in photo number 4? I made the video and didn't notice it till I was finished. 


Another possibility is growing rocks. Rocks that are living creatures, but not like we know them to be. I remember many years ago (4-6) William Rutledge...an astronaut now living in Rwanda spoke about his experience during his Apollo 20 mission. He said he saw yellow living rocks on the abandoned cigar shaped UFO in Deporte crater on the moon. He said they grew in size and a useful liquid chemical came out of them. 


NASA urls below. SCW




24 comments:

  1. Hi Scott,

    This is one of the most interesting set of Mars photos we have access to. I'd like to see those we don't have access to! I'm sure there are many even more interesting ones! To me though this looks even like someone has actually been scuffling carelessly around the site here, and couldn’t quite remember where everything was before he/she kicked it! Or didn't have the time to double check everything properly.

    Obviously I'm stretching credibility here. Or am I? Not only does this object move, but there seem to be many stones and rocks 'out of place', around this spot, if you look at the different photos. Including the two you mention but also others. Or another possibility, could the moving object itself have dislodged these other stones and rocks?

    My only slight difference of opinion here with you Scott, is that the moving object doesn't look like any kind of animal or duck like bird to me. Though I do agree it could well be. But it simply looks like a moving rock to me, which is why I wonder if it's more likely if it could have been 'placed' in the different positions?

    The rock with the crack is also very interesting. Note that it seems to have a sort of tail! And this 'tail' also appears to change its position in the different photos. It even looks metallic. A metallic object. Fascinating. What indeed is going on here? To me it seems that there are pics from different angles though. This obviously has to be taken into account. But even allowing for this (are the shots from different angles?), if true, there is something not quite right here. At one point of studying this I thought the apparent moving 'object' could simply be not an object, but the concave depression sloping away from the rocks, giving the illusion of being an object when in fact it was a depression in the ground. Appearing so because of the changing shadows, ie. dark and light in different places as sequential, following photos were taken.

    But further study seems to rule this out also. As no other shadows change anything like so much.

    I've started checking your site, Scott because of the various interesting posts you keep coming up with. You work hard. It's greatly appreciated. I'm sure you will be aware also of J P Skippers site, 'Mars Anomaly Research'......? He also posts similar articles to this, though his site is less UFO orientated.

    Many thanks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I totally welcome your opinion. Even if scientists looked at these photos, they would debate about it being an animal or rock for ages before they agreed on something. It just creates so many new questions.

      What really matters is...you know life exists out there and we few know it.

      Delete
  2. P.S. Have to say, having gone back again to these pics., that I am coming round to your opinion Scott, that this could indeed be an animal of some kind. Looking again for the 'umpteenth'. time, it actually looks to me very similar to a tortoise or turtle like creature with a fairly long neck, standing upright on its hind legs!! One of those intriguing, baffling photos on Mars, like the 'female' on a rock one.

    Thanks again.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Very interesting!! Did u notice the second animal in picture No.3 immediately behind the one you circled?? Also do you think some of those "rocks" around the animals could also be creatures of some kind because to me they seem to have faces??!! Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes I think this black creature is an animal. It is camouflaged to look like its surrounds and since it seems to have a hard black shell, there must be dangerous animals on the surface that caused it to evolve this protective shell...unless its to protect it from heat/cold.

      Yes I saw a face on one...but hard to confirm since its a bit out of focus.

      Delete
  4. I BELIEVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. In the crater March,3-2012-There is a distinguished face in it.Very deep side view of a person...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I see it. It really does look like a black face.

      Delete
  6. In the pic with the crater;March-3-2012.There is a striking side view of a persons face.Pretty detailed! Nose-Eyes-Mouth-Forehead-Jawline-Chin-

    ReplyDelete
  7. On the pic of the crater;March-3-2012-There is a very striking side view of a persons face;Forehead-eye-brow-nose-mouth-chin-jaw-Very detailed-

    ReplyDelete
  8. I also think it is some kind of turtle type animal. I've seen turtles here stand on there back legs to reach food so it's not a far jump to relate this animal as a turtle type of creature. I've heard some say life here came from there so maybe we've got more proof. As always thank you for your site and hard work.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, I'm glad you like the site. Yeah, life on Mars must exist in some form or other. I just wonder what this game NASA is playing by skipping past all the evidence.

      Delete
  9. Your starting to get some publicity Scott.

    http://www.examiner.com/article/hard-evidence-of-life-on-mars-that-nasa-doesn-t-want-to-discuss

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey thats cool. The more people that know about it the better. Maybe it will inspire others to go out and search NASA, ESA, JAXA photos for more. Thanks for letting me know.

      Delete
  10. Judging by the relative positions of the flatish white rocks in 4 and 5, and the darker high contrast rocks in the background of 1, 2 and 3, the on-site locations where the individual images were taken are -completely- different. The rover has moved in such a way that the alignments are different in both azimuth and elevation and the surface is far from flat. Note the 'v' shaped set of rocks above the 'creature' in 2 is between the larger boulders, but -above- the left boulder in 3. The 'creature' is obscured by the boulder on the right in 2, and the boulder on the left in 4.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I understand what you are saying, however it doesn't account for the giant change in position of the black object, then its disappearance. The photo angle is off a little bit, not a huge amount.

      Delete
  11. I firmly believe that the Government has many more lies and secrets than any truths. They could at least let this stuff leak out slowly and then make it look like a great discovery. Then they would look like hero's. But no let's keep it all tight lipped and secret until it blows up in our faces so to speak.. Thanks again for your site.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I just checked the URL's and the videos are GONE! Also, as several people mentioned, "several" black "rocks" in the background aren't in every picture that you showed. Multiple rock people migrating I guess. Great detective work! Somebody at NASA saw your video and then removed the evidence.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I just checked and its still there, don't worry. You might want to have 3 different types of web browsers on hand in case one has a "flash," problem. It happens to me sometimes. I have five browsers.

      And hey, thanks. Glad you liked it. Sure wish we could get the use of a rover for a few weeks to chase after some of these discoveries.

      Delete
  13. Hi Scott, congratulations on not letting go of this one. Something like this should be exactly what the rovers were sent to Mars to investigate. The fact that NASA flatly refuses to ever have a closer look at anything of interest proves they are hiding the truth from us.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Hi Scott, congratulations on not letting go of this one. Something like this should be exactly what the rovers were sent to Mars to investigate. The fact that NASA flatly refuses to ever have a closer look at anything of interest proves they are hiding the truth from us.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Hi Scott, congratulations on not letting go of this one. Nobody has offered a satisfactory explanation for this phenomenon. You'd think the reason rovers were sent to Mars in the first place was to have a good look at objects of interest like this one. The fact that NASA refuses to investigate any anomalous objects and expects us all to be excited about the latest hole they drilled in a rock is all the proof I need that they are not telling the truth.

    ReplyDelete
  16. for me it looks like an explorer with its alien looking lifebag.
    as well it looks somehow holographic, maybe a life support field around the creature.
    why are the other pictures missing?
    i'm so tired from this hide and seek game what the authorities
    and military are playing

    ReplyDelete
  17. What about the fact the picture with 3 segments the top pic looks like a lion standing face towards the left and bottom picture looks as if it is laying facing away from cam with tail lifted....

    ReplyDelete