November 11, 2014

Updated: Circle With Cross On Mars, Nov 2014, UFO Sighting News.


Date of discovery: Nov 2014
Location of discovery: Mars
Photo source: http://www.gigapan.com/gigapans/124981/snapshots/420909

Updated: Nov 12, 2014. I tried to use some programs to take the blur from the photo above. It worked about 50%, but still a lot there. The two examples are below. Sorry I couldn't get all the blur out. SCW










This photo contains a lot of fun things not to mention a massive object blurred out by NASA. I took some screenshots of the objects that were most interesting. One anomaly was a circle with a cross in it. This was a long stone-like pillar. I say stone-like, because I don't believe this substance is stone, but a special metal with built in tech. There is also a lot of figures. Most are carved or standing, but one glowing figure of a woman in a dress is nothing less than confusing. She is floating in mid air along the side of a stone like object. Unlike most the figures, this glowing woman looks alive. SCW 
















22 comments:

  1. Why is that one picture blurred?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Isn't possible in anyway try to inverse the blurred object?
    Dang:
    That thing is freaking strange

    ReplyDelete
  3. Gigapan much retouch pictures NASA,and where they don't leave black squares or blatantly doing spot.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Scott what are your thoughts on the blurred out image? for me that one is the most interesting.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It holds a structure or machine behind it. On the far lower left we see that this object has some skin that fell off of it, but thats all I can make out. There are a lot of computer programs that unblur photos. Maybe a professional photographer might have the skills and equipment to show us whats behind it. NASA only wants to hide evidence from the public. This blur is testimony to that fact. It takes up a large part of the photo. It was never NASAs job to inform the public of the existence of aliens, but instead to keep the publics curiosity satisfied with boring little facts about science to keep a status quo. This way the US gets hold of alien tech and gives it to DARPA to use on military tech. They never cared about the public and what we wanted.

      Delete
  5. There's a photo of a rock with a face inside a red circle. At the bottom of the rock if you zoom in there's a tower symbol then a upside down w , then another face followed by a star. ???????

    ReplyDelete
  6. There's a photo of a rock with a face inside a red circle. At the bottom of the rock if you zoom in there's a tower symbol then a upside down w , then another face followed by a star. ???????

    ReplyDelete
  7. There's a photo of a rock with a face inside a red circle. At the bottom of the rock if you zoom in there's a tower symbol then a upside down w , then another face followed by a star. ???????

    ReplyDelete
  8. Check these out:
    http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/msss/00072/mcam/0072MR0005610190103644E01_DXXX.jpg
    http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/msss/00072/mcam/0072MR0005610180103643E01_DXXX.jpg
    There is your 'ship'...

    ReplyDelete
  9. pppppppffffffff. You could make a face out of nearly any rock you want - dear oh dear.........

    ReplyDelete
  10. In the pic woman figure zoom in on the rocks bottom left and you can clearly see 2 face like images with 2 eyes nose and mouth. And also another face like image behind the woman figure. Strange that so many face like structures can be identified. Also above the "woman" is a shape that has 3 long thin finger like protrusions similar to the the deep sea fish that has a luminescent lure to attract prey. Would love to hear from an expert who could explain how these rock formations may occur naturally as result of the environment.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I am a prolific digital artist and a VFX professional. My thoughts on these images.

    Cross in Rock:
    I don't see a cross but two similarly shaped indents. It doesn't necessarily look intentional to me. Think about the native american grind marks on large stones here in the US. At a glance a single one, if shallow could be mistaken for a natural occurrence. But the repetition of the shape and size allow us to understand they were created by intentional forces. This seems like a fantastic natural shape from something impacting the rock (which is split in to already indicating a good impact or jarring event).

    The Statues:
    It's a far reach to call these statues. It would be like justifying the shapes we see in clouds as an intentional manipulation to produce art.

    The Blurry Object:
    This looks (and on closer inspection is) photo manipulation. The pixels and makeup of the object are not of the same fidelity as the ground plane. It also appears to have a different light source. The shadows from the other rocks in the image are heavily saturated black. No gradation. The object though carries none of this light profile. If it did the whole front right portion would be blown out with hard light, producing a long dark, near black shadow. Why wouldn't it produce a shadow over the ground behind it and on the rocks in front of the camera plane. If it was there and blurred out by NASA, the blur would have much darker elements to kit indicating the shadows and such (not mention the whole left side that we can see clearly would be in shadow unless a second light source was hitting it. To me this looks a like a large piece from digging equipment skewed and dropped in in a way that makes it look foreign.

    Alien Skull:
    What about this implies an organic / fossilized remains? This looks like nothing more than a rock with mixed sediment (soft and hard). During the harsh seasons on mars, the softer material could easily be eroded leaving this exact look. Look at the stones in the Siloli Desert or the Trona Pinnacles in California (I've visited the pinnacles many times to draw and fantasize about alien environments).

    The statues:
    Again just look at photos of the Trona Pinnacles. When I have drawn or painted here, I see many shapes and forms that seem intentional, but alas they are natural.

    Good stuff. I enjoyed going over the Mars material. Hopefully soon we will get proof positive.

    ReplyDelete
  12. The only interesting picture on the absurd site it the picture of a rock with smooth edges.. and that's not really all that interesting either.. this is about the weakest hoax site I've seen in quite some time... Btw, the blurred picture is a sad reach to pretend there's anything interesting behind the blur..

    ReplyDelete
  13. Your site is very interesting. You might like to know you've made the news in Houston, TX. Carol Christian of the Houston Chronicle did a short article referencing UFO Sightings Daily and depicting some of the images seen here, among other sites. The title is "NASA Cover-up? Curiosity rover images appear to show metal object on Mars", dated November 10, 2014. The web address is: http://www.chron.com/news/nation-world/space/article/NASA-Cover-up-Curiosity-rover-images-appear-to-5883277.php#photo-6475915

    ReplyDelete
  14. the photo with the blur can be found on the jpl website i believe.. dont think its faked

    ReplyDelete
  15. I truely believe all those picture has been altered with in some way or another. In one of the picture there is a glowing women but if u look closely u can see she has a dress on!! Do alians wear human clothing??? It's all a joke!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. NASA uses photo shop on most every photo released that has detail. They dumb down the detail to satisfy your curiosity, but not inform your curiosity of whats really there. NASA likes #$#%ing with our minds.

      Delete
  16. Looking at the raw pictures on NASA's website http://mars.nasa.gov/msl/multimedia/raw/?rawid=0072MR0005610190103644E01_DXXX&s=72 It's a part of Curiosity that has been "stitched" into the panorama.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, it was sewn into a panoramic, however the object is not part of the rover. I have seen many parts of the rover in photos, most of them clear. This has been deliberately blurred out. Cool that you found the originals. Can you find the bottom and sides?

      Delete
    2. Yes the sides and bottom can be found on other images from that sol which can be found here http://mars.nasa.gov/msl/multimedia/raw/?s=72&camera=MAST_

      It can be a little tricky to work out which raw image fits where in this panorama, a lot like a jigsaw puzzle.

      It seems that other elements of the panorama come from images taken on different sols (67 to 75 according to the caption on gigapan) to find the raw images for this change the ?s=72 in the above link for the day you want to see, ie ?s=75. most of the element of the panorama seem to be from sol 72, 74 and 75, with only a few thrown in from other days.

      Delete
  17. IT'S BETTER IF WE STUDY THE BILLY MEIER CASE AND HIS CONTACT REPORTS ABOUT THE MARS AND FUTURE...

    ReplyDelete