2016-04-07

Newest Face Near Curiosity Rover Is 100% Proof Of NASA Being Incompetent To Run Rover Project, March 2016, UFO Sighting News.



Date of discovery: March 7, 2016
Location of discovery: Mars
Source photo: http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/proj/msl/redops/ods/surface/sol/01303/opgs/edr/ncam/NRB_513174527EDR_F0540006NCAM00354M_.JPG

This photo is the newest one on the Curiosity Rover blog that updates daily. This face in the photos here, was less than a meter from the Curiosity rover. I'm not accusing NASA of hiding this face, because they did put it up on their site today, but I am accusing NASA to total incompetence of being in charge of the Curiosity Rover project itself. I think if we are going to learn the truth, the public needs to take back control of this rover and begin a new with exploring and searching. UFOlogists around the globe have found over 5,000 ancient artefacts in Curiosity Rovers photos alone. If we the public take control of it, we can go back to each and every anomaly and either rule it out or confirm its 100% authentic. The world deserves the truth, and NASA is holding historic discoveries back, due...to "national security," issues. 
Scott C. Waring
www.ufosightingsdaily.com



6 comments:

  1. Booooooooooo

    Another rock that looks like a face.

    Why do you think they are sculpted faces and not rocks?

    It's just sad at this point.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I see at least 32 rocks that look like faces in the source pic. Some more convincing that yours.

    THAT'S BECAUSE SOMETIMES....

    ROCKS LOOK LIKE FACES

    Fucking dolt.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Seriously now your reaching this is clearly just a rock that happens to kind of resemble a face. You post a lot of good images but when you post things like this it takes away some of your creditability

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's a lost cause. For some reason Scott thinks random landscape is sculpted faces, and claims things like it's 100% proof. It's ridiculous.

      Delete
  4. To be a "teacher" you have poor spelling and grammar.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This post is 100% proof that you are incompetent to be a ufologist.

    Also you need to learn what the word "proof" means.

    ReplyDelete

Welcome to the forum, what your thoughts?