2015-02-25

Crashed UFO Found On Mars, Feb 2015, Video, UFO Sighting News.


Date of sighting: February 2015
Location of sighting: Mars
NASA photo 1: http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/proj/msl/redops/ods/surface/sol/00644/opgs/edr/ncam/NLB_454665258EDR_F0331036NCAM00293M_.JPG
NASA photo 2: http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/proj/msl/redops/ods/surface/sol/00644/opgs/edr/ncam/NRB_454665258EDR_F0331036NCAM00293M_.JPG
NASA photo 3: http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/proj/msl/redops/ods/surface/sol/00644/opgs/edr/ncam/NRB_454665226EDR_F0331036NCAM00293M_.JPG

The whale like tail on Mars was discovered by Streetcap1 of Youtube. He states that it looks like a crashed spaceship on the surface of Mars. It does. This crashed UFO is not a glitch in the photo process. It was found in three photos on the NASA site. This anomaly on Mars is very unusual in its design. It has a shape like a whale tail or a giant goblet. I really wish the rover would take a look at it, but it seems this is as close as the public will get. SCW

26 comments:

  1. Looks like a part of a large meteorite.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I bet some of our "friends" will engagingly say they found the Graal. Anyway, an ancient structure or a NASA trasmission point

    ReplyDelete
  3. Verve, you can't even say it'a a normal rock that perfectly fits the rest of the enviroment as the other rocks do. Question: what does make some rocks so black when all the others look like normal rocks? Ps: i have pics showing some rocks that apparently seem to be what they should be but in fact they are living creatures! Scott, where can i send them to you?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I see your point of view, fair enough. But when i hear about those formations i expect to see groups of structures, as they come up from the ground on earth and not a single strange something that seems to have nothing to do with the structures you mentioned before, but this is just my point of view...

      Delete
    2. The formations you talk about are earth's crust that pops up or big rocks eroded by wind or water. And i think this is not the case. But i could be wrong of course

      Delete
  4. A firm believer but not in this type of thing. For advance races they make rubbish pilots.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Charlie Charlie Charlie, listen, how many times my friend have i suggested to you that external damaging pwr's beyond the advanced flight crews control just might be a major contributing factor in that civilizations space vehical to crash, & not to mention in mars ancient past a "Global State of War" had occurred that in all likely hood was a contributing factor in the advanced ET crafts failer or distruction..

      Delete
    2. Well Charlie, i wont argue the HI POSSIBILITY imo of something else other than a space vehical tho none natural sticking out the ground, & & yes that just may be indeed another type of manufactured piece of component that even i've indicated recently on this blog also so ill agree w/ that...

      HOWEVER, that does not mean my friend that the ancient martian inhabitants even tho they in my guestimation just may have utilize energy/physic's in a diff style then we do in this time on earth...

      I envision seismic activity of great proportions after the global warfare devastation of that planet in its ancient past that washed & covered a number of artifacts that the mars rover is now recording, & of course Never A Strait Answer aKa NASA will not release the more juicy cam pics to "US uninformed out of the loop" masses of asses in their & the GRB's opinion, & as far as there concern they'd willingly leave the masses of humanity out the loop regarding the ET's tech & especially any cultural societal indications to the world explored regarding them w/out a dought in my mind sir...

      Delete
    3. LOL, good one Charlie, but these are drones, no pilots. They are made solid, because their propulsion has no weight limits. This way they get destroyed slower in battle. DARPA will one day make them this way to.

      Delete
  5. Steph, if you want to send anything to Scott. send it to: scottcwaring@hotmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  6. BTW, Do you guys notice the white orb at the top-right corner in the first picture?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Damn there is an orb! Good find. I didn't notice that

      Delete
    2. Not an orb. Looks like an optical error/ CCD glitch to me.

      Delete
  7. Thanx Vish, i'll send them as soon as possible! Yep, there's a white orb over there and it doesn't seem to be pixelation...

    ReplyDelete
  8. Do Scott check comments on weekends or something? I can't wait for him to look up in the picture again and see that there's an orb and i'll wait for your pics if he posts them

    ReplyDelete
  9. I achieved this conclusion because these "rocks" look approximately like each other, they have this kind of triangular shape, most of the time they live in groups, they have tris circular spot that seems to be their eye and when along a cliff, they have a side lifted from the ground, and rocks are not always lifted on a side. You gotta consider the jet-lag! Scott lives in Thailand and he's a teacher, but.......SCOTT! COME OVER AND CHECK THE ORB!!! And the "rocks" :D

    ReplyDelete
  10. I would classify them in our snails family..

    ReplyDelete
  11. This post is getting old so it looks like Scott won't check it again. can you send me the pics, I am curious

    ReplyDelete
  12. Well in the NASA pic #3 the orb has moved far away from the thing but can still be seen.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Well in the NASA pic #3 the orb has moved far away from the thing but can still be seen

    ReplyDelete
  14. We have a inquiry about the article, where can i contact the creator?


    Here is my web-site - questions or concerns about business radio compatibility

    ReplyDelete

Welcome to the forum, what your thoughts?