Date of discovery: unknown
Location of laboratory: possibly Dutch
A type of gravity controlled tech that produces action without reaction. This destroys Newtons third law of motion...obliterating it. There are five short videos and yes they are real. This looks like 100% proof that the government has anti-gravity tech in their hands...but won't allow the public to know due to its military applications, meaning it has to be kept secret. Not exactly the transparency Obama promised is it? With the voice telling us what is happening in the video it is clear that this video was made as a demonstration to scientists outside the country and somehow leaked to the public sector. SCW
Video states:
An anonymous individual referring to himself only as "S.F." has posted a series of videos detailing experiments performed on a gravity defying black box along with propulsion characteristics. He claims that it violates Newton's laws producing action without reaction!
Internet videos of devices claimed to break the laws of physics are pretty common these days. However, once in a while one comes along that makes you look twice. An anonymous individual identifying himself only with the initials "S.F." has posted a series of enigmatic videos of a very curious black box. During the video, tests are performed on this black box and a voice over describes the technology.
Watching the videos you will see a remotely controlled black box move across low friction surfaces such as water, spheres resembling ping-pong balls, and what appears to be glass marbles. In each situation there is no apparent "reaction" from the movement of the black box. For example, when it is placed on a transparent platform (free to move in any direction) the black box will not push the platform backwards as it moves forward. Instead, it will pull the platform along with it. In another video you will see the box (which is claimed to weigh one pound) push against a concrete block. The result is the concrete block moves a substantial distance without any apparent reaction force. During the video, the device is described as representing a gravity control technology that produces action without reaction. Gravity is actually claimed to be produced by the box via the use of solid state components. This reaction-less propulsion mechanism is claimed to be more efficient than any current technology used today and can be used to produce motion in any direction, potentially including up or down. S.F. claims that this technology can allow for travel through any medium including water, gas, and the vacuum of space.
Watching the videos you will see a remotely controlled black box move across low friction surfaces such as water, spheres resembling ping-pong balls, and what appears to be glass marbles. In each situation there is no apparent "reaction" from the movement of the black box. For example, when it is placed on a transparent platform (free to move in any direction) the black box will not push the platform backwards as it moves forward. Instead, it will pull the platform along with it. In another video you will see the box (which is claimed to weigh one pound) push against a concrete block. The result is the concrete block moves a substantial distance without any apparent reaction force. During the video, the device is described as representing a gravity control technology that produces action without reaction. Gravity is actually claimed to be produced by the box via the use of solid state components. This reaction-less propulsion mechanism is claimed to be more efficient than any current technology used today and can be used to produce motion in any direction, potentially including up or down. S.F. claims that this technology can allow for travel through any medium including water, gas, and the vacuum of space.
Video part 3 Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVDOAY_6Q6A&feature=plcp
Video part 4 link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYhjZK7WBjs&feature=plcp
Video part 5 link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYhjZK7WBjs&feature=plcp
I am not sure what is being shown in the video. However, I published notes on reactionless force generation back in 2002:
ReplyDelete"All this implies that we can expect yet another mystery to appear on the physics scene someday: a reactionless force generator. By using field technology, the generator would create a beam of mechanical force, but the generator would not experience an "equal and opposite" (Newtonian) reaction. Instead, the reaction would be "equal and radial" (perpendicular) to the beam generated, and would seem to cancel itself out within the generator. The system would act like a cannon but with no Newtonian kick-back."
http://scripturalphysics.org/4v4a/ADVPROP.html#ReactionlessForce
"(A clarification about Reactionless Propulsion: The beamed propulsion concept requires an Earth based generator to transmit the beam to the spacecraft and push it along. The craft could be just an ordinary spacecraft, or even a chunk of rock. Although this scheme has some applications, I don't believe it is practical and safe for space flight in general. But there is an alternative: mount the generator on the spacecraft. It would at first seem that there is no point in mounting such a generator on a spacecraft because the beam generating apparatus produces no Newtonian back reaction. A beam projected from the rear of the craft would NOT produce any forward thrust on the spacecraft. But the fallacy here is that of Newtonian thinking. The beam is NOT like rocket exhaust. In order for it to produce a thrust on the spacecraft, the generator would have to be mounted at the rear, and the beam projected forward into the spacecraft itself. This would push all components/occupants of the spacecraft forward and drag the attached beam generator along with it. This is the literal equivalent of a person 'picking himself up by his own bootstraps' to leap a tall building. It is physically impossible using Newtonian action/reaction mechanics. But in the Motion Canceller concept, the reaction is perpendicular to the beam (in all radial directions) and cancels itself out within the generator). See my comment about reactionless force and railgun recoil. This also implies that the best shape for such a spacecraft would be something having radial symmetry, like a saucer or a cigar. This facilitates keeping the entire craft, and its occupants, within the boundaries of the beam.)
"http://scripturalphysics.org/4v4a/ADVPROP.html#ReactionlessPropulsion
"Electromagnetic science is full of non-intuitive concepts—things that seem contrary to common sense and what you were taught in high school physics. Consider, for example, how two charged particles interact when one is moving and the other is not (or when they are on perpendicular trajectories). . . .Newton's law of action/reaction does not apply in certain situations in electromagnetics, because the "force" is actually canceling a motion instead of producing one. This allows other motions to become manifest."
http://scripturalphysics.org/4v4a/motion_couplers.html
http://scripturalphysics.org/4v4a/ADVPROP.html#MotionCancellers
I found the business also needs to spam you by demanding your e-mail before enabling you to obtain their software.
ReplyDeletehttp://Www.Youruniverse.Co.uk/skype-recorder/, http://Www.prettymay.net/
Also visit my website - http://rhgc.weebly.com/
You are really cool! I dont suppose I’ve read something comparable to this before. So nice to search out somebody with authentic applying for grants this topic.
ReplyDeleteRegards
Crazyask deepwebsiteslinks.com the DarkWeb Howmate